Alarie Benjamin Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts 9780199397594

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 17688.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть
При оформлении заказа до: 2026-05-14
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Июнь
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Alarie Benjamin
Название: Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts
ISBN: 9780199397594
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Классификация:

Юриспруденция и философия права

Сравнительное правоведение

Суды и судопроизводство

Конституционное и административное право

ISBN-10: 0199397597
Обложка/Формат: Hardcover
Страницы: 352
Вес: 0.78 кг.
Дата издания: 18.08.2017
Язык: English
Размер: 240 x 169 x 23
Читательская аудитория: General (us: trade)
Подзаголовок: A cross-country examination of institutional constraints on judges
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: Judicial decision-making may ideally be impartial, but in reality it is influenced by many different factors, including institutional context, ideological commitment, fellow justices on a panel, and personal preference. Empirical literature in this area increasingly analyzes this complex
collection of factors in isolation, when a larger sample size of comparative institutional contexts can help assess the impact of the procedures, norms, and rules on key institutional decisions, such as how appeals are decided. Four basic institutional questions from a comparative perspective help
address these studies regardless of institutional context or government framework. Who decides, or how is a justice appointed? How does an appeal reach the court; what processes occur? Who is before the court, or how do the characteristics of the litigants and third parties affect judicial
decision-making? How does the court decide the appeal, or what institutional norms and strategic behaviors do the judges perform to obtain their preferred outcome? This book explains how the answers to these institutional questions largely determine the influence of political preferences of
individual judges and the degree of cooperation among judges at a given point in time. The authors apply these four fundamental institutional questions to empirical work on the Supreme Courts of the US, UK, Canada, India, and the High Court of Australia. The ultimate purpose of this book is to
promote a deeper understanding of how institutional differences affect judicial decision-making, using empirical studies of supreme courts in countries with similar basic structures but with sufficient differences to enable meaningful comparison.

Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts, Alarie Benjamin